- 參考文獻
- 英文
專書
Amundson, Steven M., Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Clarify and Refine
Methodologies for Determining Patent Damages, 22 B. U. J. SCI. &
TECH. L. (2016).
Baucells, Manel & Steven A. Lippman, Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: A
Cooperative Game Theoretic Analysis of Hold-Up in Co-Ownership,
22 CARDOZO L. REV. (2001).
Burns, Fiona, Adverse Possession and Title-by-Registration Systems in
Australia and England, 35 MELB. U. L. REV. (2011).
Chang, Yun-Chien, Tenancy in “Anticommons”? A Theoretical and
Empirical Analysis of Co-Ownership, 4 J. LEGAL ANALYSIS (2012).
Cusine, D. J., Adverse Possession of Land in Scots and English Law, 45:3
INT’L & COMP. L.Q. (1996).
Fox, Nicholas, Bas Berghuis, Ina vom Feld & Laura Orlando, Accounting
for Differences: Damages and Profits in European Patent Infringement,
37:9 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. (2015).
Frye, Amanda, Note, “Inextricably Commingled”: A Restitution Perspective
in Patent Remedies, 26 HARV. J. L. & TECH. (2013).
Golden, John M. & Karen E. Sandrik, A Restitution Perspective on
Reasonable Royalties, 36 REV. LITIG. (2017).
Gravois, Jeanne M., The Revision of the Louisiana Co-Ownership Law, 65
TUL. L. REV. (1991).
Greenfield, Debra L., Greenberg v. Miami Children’s Hospital: Unjust
Enrichment and the Patenting of Human Genetic Material, 15 ANNALS
HEALTH L. (2006).
Holbrook, Timothy R., Boundaries, Extraterritoriality, and Patent
Infringement Damages, 92 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2017).
Holderness, Clifford G., Joint Ownership and Alienability, 23 INT’L REV. L.
& ECON. (2003).
Layne-Farrar, Anne, The Patent Damages Gap: An Economist’s Review of
U.S. Statutory Patent Damages Apportionment Rules, 26 TEX. INTELL.
PROP. L. J. (2018).
Lee, Alice, Adverse Possession and Proprietary Estoppel as Defences to
Actions for Possession, 29 HONG KONG L. J. (1999).
Lee, Erick S., Reconsidering Reasonable Royalty Damages Methodology in
Patent Infringement Suits: Supplementing Georgia Pacific with the
Reasonable Royalty Determination Board, 92 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK
OFF. SOC’Y (2010).
Lee, William F. & A. Douglas Melamed, Breaking the Vicious Cycle of
Patent Damages, 101 CORNELL L. REV. (2016).
Lemley, Mark A. & Carl Shapiro, Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, 85
TEX. L. REV. (2007).
Malaspina, Peter A., Patent Citation Analysis and Patent Damages, 18
CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. (2019).
Morgan, Michael & Sorin Cohn-Sfetcu, Automated Software Systems for
Intellectual Property Compliance, 20 NO.12 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L.
J. (2008).
Panesar, Sukhninder, Quantifying Beneficial Interest in Joint Ownership
Disputes: Is the Constructive Trust Changing?, 17:1 COVENTRY L. J.
(2012).
Panesar, Sukhninder, The Importance of Possession in the Common Law
Tradition, 8:1 COVENTRY L. J. (2003).
Panesar, Sukhninder, The Importance of Possession of Land, 33 HONG
KONG L. J. (2003).
Roach, George P., Counting the Beans: Unjust Enrichment and the
Defendant’s Overhead, 16 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L. J. (2008).
Roach, George P., How Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Can Improve
Your Corporate Claim, 26 REV. LITIG. (2007).
Roberts, Caprice L., The Case for Restitution and Unjust Enrichment
Remedies in Patent Law, 14 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. (2010).
Scott, Charlotte, Damages Inquires and Accounts of Profits in the IPEC,
38:5 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. (2016).
Shen, Chung-Lun, Reasonable Royalties and the Calculation of Patent
Damages: Reflections and Recommendations for A Fair and Adequate
Calculating Basis of Reasonable Royalties in Terms of Harmonization
of China-Taiwan Regional Patent Laws, 12 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP.
(2013).
Sidak, J. Gregory, Bargaining Power and Patent Damages, 19 STAN. TECH.
L. REV. (2015).
Singer, Hal J. & Kyle Smith, What Does an Economist Have to Say About
the Calculation of Reasonable Royalties?, 14 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL.
(2009).
Smith, Douglas G., The Increasing Use of Challenges to Expert Evidence
Under Daubert and Rule 702 in Patent Litigation, 22 J. INTELL. PROP.
