- 英文摘要
- This study aimed to balance the conflict between the right to disclosure and the right of paternity as moral rights and the guarantee of equal protection under the constitution. We discussed whether the proviso of Section 1, Article 15 and Section 2, Article 16 of the Taiwan Copyright Act, which excludes the right to disclosure and the right of paternity for public servants, infringes on the copyright interests of public servants. In addition, we also determined whether excluding protections concerning such rights for public servants benefits the harmonization of public interests. Moreover, we sought to ascertain whether public servants’ inability to avail of protections concerning such rights for their works slows down national cultural developments. On April 8, 2021, amendments to the Taiwan Copyright Act were passed by the committee of the Executive Yuan and were left pending for examination in the committee of the Legislative Yuan. However, these amendments were modified from the original proviso of Section 1, Article 15 to the Clause 1, Section 1, Article 15 but were not changed the Section 2, Article 16 of the Taiwan Copyright Act. Thus, public servants remain unprotected regarding the right to disclosure and the right of paternity as moral rights. Reasons for the proposed amendments include the restriction of legal persons in promoting national public matters should public servants not receive protections for their works as a moral right, which would actually deprive public servants’ guarantee of equal protection under the constitution. The Taiwan Copyright Act is built on the civil law system that has a tradition of protecting moral rights. As each work of an individual is protected with regard to the right to disclosure, right of paternity, and right of integrity, legislators should include protections in the law concerning such rights as moral rights for public servants’ works. This study examined whether public servants’ works could be protected as a moral right by analyzing various legal theories and judgments. We also propose concrete suggestions for amending the Taiwan Copyright Act.
- 目次
- 壹、前言
一、研究動機及目的
二、研究方法
三、論文架構
貳、公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權保護之現行法規定
一、公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權保護之現行法規定
二、從平等權觀點來剖析公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權保護之爭議
三、小結
參、公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權與平等權保護之比較法研究
一、國際條約有關公開發表權及姓名表示權保護之規定
二、美國著作權法關於公務員公開發表權和姓名表示權保護之規定
三、美國法院有關公務員公開發表權與姓名表示權保護之見解
四、小結
肆、我國司法實務針對公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權及平等權保護之探討
一、與平等權相關之大法官會議解釋
二、臺灣臺北地方法院 109 年度智易字第 6 號刑事判決
三、最高法院 98 年度台上字第 34 號民事判決
四、小結
伍、我國法制對於公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權與平等權保護之全面檢視
一、著作權法規範針對公務員公開發表權、姓名表示權保護之不平等對待
二、公務員是否能平等享有禁止不當變更權之保護？
三、現行著作權法針對公務員著作人格權保護不足之解決方案
四、小結
陸、結論與建議
一、結論
二、解決方案及建議
